St. Vincent School of Theology
  • Home
  • Academics
    • PhD Program
    • Masters in Theology >
      • Systematic Curriculum
      • Moral Curriculum
      • Liturgical Curriculum
      • Vincentian Curriculum
      • Biblical Curriculum
    • Masters in Pastoral Ministry >
      • Masters in Pastoral Ministry Curriculum
    • Ordained Ministry Program >
      • Ordained Ministry Curriculum
    • Philosophy Program >
      • Bachelor of Arts Major in Philosophy
      • Philosophy for Theological Studies
    • Hapag-Layko >
      • PhD Program Curriculum
      • General Theology Lecture Series
      • Studies in Christian Theology
      • Training for Lay Liturgical Ministries
      • Programs and Schedule
    • ITF
  • Admission
    • Admission Requirement >
      • Ordained Ministry/MA
      • Foreign Students
      • PhD
      • ITF
      • Hapag-Layko
    • Enrollment Procedure
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Administration
    • Administrators
    • Departments and Commitees
    • Faculty
  • Research
    • Research and Publications Office
    • Hapag: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Theological Research >
      • Engaging with the Word in the Biblical World
      • Challenges to Filipino Theology in the Globalized Context
    • Institutional Research >
      • Faith in Action: Catholic Social Teaching on the Ground >
        • Training for Basic Ecclesial Communities
      • Philippine Local Churches After the Spanish Regime: Quae Mari Sinico and Beyond >
        • BOOK LAUNCH
  • Library
  • Alumni Affairs
    • SVST 30th Alumni Homecoming
    • Homecoming Programme
    • SVST Alumni Homecoming Online Registration
    • Graduate Tracer Survey
  • Partner Communities
    • Project SOW
    • Quezon City Prison Year 1
    • Resource Center for Social Concerns
    • Summer popular Mission
  • Doing Public Theology

SPECTACLE

3/14/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Gospel Reflection - Second Sunday of Lent (Luke 9: 28B-36)

On the mountain, there was a spectacle, an overwhelming spectacle. Jesus was transfigured. His clothes turned dazzlingly white. He was talking to two great men, Moses and Elijah. Peter, James and John were star-struck. Peter did not know what to say; he did not know what he was saying. There was a voice from the cloud. Then they fell silent, so dumbfounded that they did not tell anyone.

In the valley “when they had come down from the mountain the next day” (Lk. 9: 37-48), things were very different. Quite opposite from the majestic silence of the mountain, people were shouting in chaos. Shouts of fear, cries of pain. There was very sick boy convulsed, with twisted body and foaming mouth. He was possessed and torn by the devil, the father said, or by poverty and hunger – or all of them combined. Jesus cured him. And a few moments later, Jesus also talked about his own fears of dying. He was afraid that he will be killed one day by people whom he has offended by his stand on issues. His disciples did not cure the boy, nor did they listen to Jesus. They did not understand him. Because they did not care. Their concerns lie somewhere else: on who will get the senate seats!

The Transfiguration of Jesus is a transformative experience of light in the midst of darkness, of healing in the midst of pain, of glory in the midst of defeat, of life in the midst of death. It is a promise, a hope. Not empty promises nor false hopes. But real possibilities already coming to be when they have come down the mountain.

The apostles were actually tempted to stay. Peter proposed to build three tents. But Jesus did not let them. He even forbade them to say anything about what happened. He wanted them to come down the mountain and be the sense of hope in the midst of despair, to be the stillness in times of chaos, to be the truth in a world of lies.

Real life is in the valley, not on the mountaintop; in muddy rough grounds not on the clouds. That is where transfiguration lies.

But modern peoples like the illusion of spectacle on the mountain.

Already in 1967, a French philosopher Guy Debord once said that we have become a “society of spectacle.” We have forgotten real material life. We easily forget history. We live in contemplation of the immense accumulation of spectacles.

We now live by proxy of images and representation. We do not want to experience the beauty of the scene. We only take shots, upload it on Facebook and see it again for the first time. Some young people jokingly say, if it not on FB, it does not exist.

The spectacle is an inversion of life. Lived experience is turned into commodities which take on life by itself and dominate us. Real life dies and the manufactured image now occupies the center stage. We are hooked into the image 24/7. We like it. We believe it. We worship it.

Yet the spectacle domesticates the rebellion of the lived. We are effectively silenced and cowered into submission without our knowing. We are numbed into believing that what is “seemingly lived” is life itself. We forget that the system manufactures it for us, rendered it palatable for our consumption – those dominant systems in economy, culture and politics.

“The celebrity, the spectacular representation of a living human being, embodies this banality by embodying the image of a possible role. Being a star means specializing in the seemingly lived; the star is the object of identification with the shallow seeming life that has to compensate for the fragmented productive specializations which are actually lived.” (Guy Debord)

Donald Trump of the United States, Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil but also Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines. They won because they were a dazzling spectacle. Following them, people are now entertained by Ronald Bato dela Rosa, Bong Go, Bong Revilla, Jinggoy Estrada, Freddie Aguilar, Harry Roque, Mocha Uson, Imee Marcos, and many others – all clowns and performers of “The Inday Sarah Show”.

People want the spectacle, the strobe lights, the performance, the grand show. Never mind honesty, human rights, track record or effective governance. We elect them because they are entertainers, cute or gwapo. Or they promise to change things for us in the shortest time possible without us doing anything.
Never mind misogyny or corruption. Forget civility or protection of national sovereignty. People do not come to rallies to discuss these issues, they say. They come to be entertained. So they gave them a good show, a spectacle of clowns and charlatans, of singers and dancers, of performers and magicians, on stage and in real life.

For what truly counts, they believe, is what you see under the spot light, on video walls and computer screens, on Twitter and Facebook – no matter how fake or twisted – regardless of their relation to history and reality.
​
But the Jesus’ transfiguration – and ours, too – is not a dazzling spectacle of commodified life. It is a truly liberating experience. And the transformation does not come about through grand promises inside clouds on mountain tops but on rough grounds, amidst cries of pain and hunger, in sighs of grief and loneliness, calling you and me to protracted but sustained action and everyday compassion. That in truth is transfiguration.

Daniel Franklin E. Pilario, C.M.
St. St Vincent SchoolofTheology - Adamson University
danielfranklinpilario@yahoo.com
0 Comments
<<Previous

    About

    Doing Public Theology is a collection of social commentaries on different socio-political issues that affect our people from an interdisciplinary theological perspective. It is the official blog of St. Vincent School of Theology

    Archives

    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    August 2017
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture

 St. Vincent School of Theology

221 Tandang Sora Avenue
P.O. Box 1179, 1116 Quezon City, Philippines


Tel.: (+632) 8939-4361; (+632) 8930-9392
Tel./Fax: (+632) 3456-4028
Proudly powered by Weebly